Category Archives: Chinese Head Tax issues + Gim Wong's Ride for Redress

Joy Kogawa opposes Bill C-333 – ACE program “so-called” Chinese head tax redress



Joy Kogawa opposes Bill C-333 – ACE program “so-called Chinese head tax redress package”

Hi Todd,

This
is almost exactly what happened with Japanese Canadian redress. My
new/old novel, “Emily Kato” (a re-write of Itsuka and just published)
describes the panic when  government tried to pull the rug out from the
redress movement. But we did stop it.

Here's
a copy of the letter that Tam asked for and that went off this morning.
It may not make it, of course, into the Globe & Mail. 

Joy

Letters to the editor
Re: Money for grievances, Nov. 19.

June
Callwood, Dr. Joseph Wong, Michele Landsberg, and many other people of
conscience have added their support to the Ontario Coalition of Chinese
Head Tax Payers and Families plus the Chinese Canadian National
Council. The strenuous efforts of these organizations to have the Head
Tax redress resolved in an honourable manner have thus far been
thwarted by the federal government.

Two
decades ago I was passionately involved in the Japanese Canadian
struggle for redress for the actions against my community during and
after World War II. The aspect of the struggle that was for me the most
arduous was the endeavour to have the government recognize the
legitimacy of our national organization. More than once in its haste
and impatience to resolve the issue, events were staged by government
officials to undercut the community's need for an inclusive, open and
healing process.

Today,
this same unseemly haste and disregard for the passions and needs of
the affected people are once more evident in the issue of the Chinese
Head Tax. Surely there is time enough to heed the many voices across
the country, pleading for the healing of those who were directly
affected and those who have been working across the country on this
matter for many years.

I
am reminded again as I was twenty years ago of the words of the prophet
Jeremiah. “They have healed the wound of my people lightly, saying
'Peace, Peace,' where there is no peace.”

Joy Kogawa

Chinese Head Tax: Open letter from Kwok Gin and Meena Wong

Chinese Head Tax: Open letter from Kwok Gin and Meena Wong


Dear Mr. Owen,
 
Your
Government has tried everything in the book to silence those of us who
refuses to accept their preset conditions of no apology, no
compensation, including cynical manipulation of the private members
legislative process to pass Bill C-333. Despite our loud opposition,
the Minister of Multiculturalism is quietly processing the paperwork
out of the spotlight to hand over the $12.5 million dollars to The
National Congress Of Chinese Canadians even before the terms and
conditions of the so-called ACE Program have been finalized. I would
like to know if there are any members of this congress with any real
remote connections with the Head Tax community or the issues at stake.
 
On
Nov.17th last Thursday, Chan Ping Ting of The NCCC held a press
conference at Ruby’s in Scarborough on how they would use the 12.5
million etc…Why weren't any Head Tax descendants informed of this ?
It was only by chance that I spoke to a Journalist colleague who was
there for 1 of the local Chinese Medias. I was informed that not only
was Chan avoiding issues of fundamental justice but this reporter
feels threaten now that her career might be jeopardized with future
media blacklist if she continues to be persistent. Does freedom of
speech mean nothing in this country anymore? Is that where this
Government is heading ? If it is…then I shouldn’t really care too much
concerning this Government’s other messages; that the Head Tax
community’s contributions in Canada were worthless; that we were not
welcome in Canada ; & we will continue to be unwelcome in the
future of Canada.


It
is totally irresponsible of your Government to empty the funds before
the Head Taxpayers and families even have the chance to seek justice.
We've been on their case for over 20 years and they’ve done zilch until
now. So why the sudden rush ?  If they’re going to throw
money out the window like that, at least take the time to hear out
those who directly suffered from 62 years of legislated racism.
Isn't that what these funds are all about ? Your Government must be
diligent & not just give the money out with no accountability. I
like to remind you in case you’ve forgotten that it is your
responsibility & one of the reasons you were elected into office to
begin with ! 



 
Our friend
& social justice activist, June Callwood said ‘to favour one group
selected by the Government is unacceptable. I haven't seen such
highhandedness for a very long time’ while she wonders ‘what are
they hiding?’ Tony Chan, ex-CBC broadcaster now broadcast prof/writer
said ‘This is worst than the W-5, ‘campus giveaway’ CTV program in
1979!’ If you remember the noise from the community back in ’79…that
was nothing compare to what you’ll be hearing this time around. 
  I've been getting overwhelming support from as far as Washington State
& MPs from B.C. but nothing from my local MP…That really pisses me off !

Again I ask you…”How can the Liberal Government negotiate with these
privileged and self-important members of so-called national group with
no historical/community understanding or connections to the issues at
stake?”
  As
a direct descendant of a Chinese Head Tax payer, I want you & your
Government to know that I’m not interested in your ‘Guilt Money’&
empty political gestures. The irresponsible rush to pawn off this money
to The NCCC without any true representation of my community is
essentially what this money is & the message it carries. What I
want for my ancestors’ are sincere recognitions for their contributions
to this country & a meaningful apology to put their souls to rest. 
  You’ll be hearing from my wide circle loud & clear at the polls this coming election !    Regards, Kwok K. Gin      Trinity Spadina       M6G 1H8 Meena Wong     Vancouver Central    V6K 2S4   Thank
you all for your recent overwhelming solidarity. Please copy and paste
the letter into a new message and place your names under this list with
your riding, postal code & forward it to your MP (google them on
line). For Liberal MPs in BC:
Vancouver Quadra Stephen Owen Owen.S@parl.gc.ca Vancouver Centre, Hedy Fry Fry.H@parl.gc.ca Vancouver Kingsway David Emerson Emerson.D@parl.gc.ca Vancouver South, Ujjal Dosanjh Dosanjh.U@parl.gc.ca Richmond, it is Raymond Chan Chan.R@parl.gc.ca Victoria, it is David Anderson Anderson.D@parl.gc.ca North Vancouver, it is Don Bell Bell.D@parl.gc.ca

Head Tax issue: Todd's letters and Joy Kogawa's letters


Head Tax issue: Todd's letter to the editors of the Vancouver Sun

To Kirk LaPointe
Managing Editor, Vancouver Sun

Hello Kirk,

Thank you for taking seriously my comments about
the Sun's coverage of Canadian issues that just happen to have Asian
names and faces behind them, and not just to feature Asian faces at
Chinese New Year time.

I am a 5th generation Canadian, my
picture and activities have been featured in the Vancouver Sun many
times since 1993, for my Gung Haggis Fat Choy events, for being awarded
the SFU Terry Fox Gold Medal, and for speaking as a Terry's Team member
for the Terry Fox Run as a living cancer survivor.

I believe
that the Vancouver Sun can offer a different perspective to the Chinese
head tax issue.  I want to know what real community leaders such as Bob
Lee, Milton Wong, David YH Lui, Lori Fung, Roy Mah and Bev Nann have to
say.  Their pioneer forefathers all likely had to pay the head tax,
their families were isolated by the Chinese Exclusion  Act.  These
people have recieved the Order of Canada and or the Order of BC.

I want to hear from
architect Joe Wai, writer Wayson Choy, historian Jim Wong-Chu.  How
about “white” people that are important members of the Chinese
community such as Dr. Jan Walls or Dr. Edgar Wickberg.

Kevin, here is the link to my blog article postings on Chinese Canadian Head Tax redress
http://www.gunghaggisfatchoy.com/blog/ChineseHead
TaxissuesGimWongsRideforRedress

What does writer Joy Kogawa think about the Chinese head tax redress
issue.  Joy and Roy Miki both worked on the Japanese Canadian redress
campaign and both are listed in Almanac's 100 Greatest British
Columbians.

Here's a letter to me from Joy Kogawa below

Regards, Todd Wong


Hi Todd,

This
is almost exactly what happened with Japanese Canadian redress. My
new/old novel, “Emily Kato” (a re-write of Itsuka and just published)
describes the panic when  government tried to pull the rug out from the
redress movement. But we did stop it.
Here's
a copy of the letter that Tam asked for and that went off this morning.
It may not make it, of course, into the Globe.  Please do anything you
want with it — add, alter, delete, whatever.
Joy

Letters to the editor
Re: Money for grievances, Nov. 19.

June
Callwood, Dr. Joseph Wong, Michele Landsberg, and many other people of
conscience have added their support to the Ontario Coalition of Chinese
Head Tax Payers and Families plus the Chinese Canadian National
Council. The strenuous efforts of these organizations to have the Head
Tax redress resolved in an honourable manner have thus far been
thwarted by the federal government.

Two
decades ago I was passionately involved in the Japanese Canadian
struggle for redress for the actions against my community during and
after World War II. The aspect of the struggle that was for me the most
arduous was the endeavour to have the government recognize the
legitimacy of our national organization. More than once in its haste
and impatience to resolve the issue, events were staged by government
officials to undercut the community's need for an inclusive, open and
healing process.

Today,
this same unseemly haste and disregard for the passions and needs of
the affected people are once more evident in the issue of the Chinese
Head Tax. Surely there is time enough to heed the many voices across
the country, pleading for the healing of those who were directly
affected and those who have been working across the country on this
matter for many years.

I
am reminded again as I was twenty years ago of the words of the prophet
Jeremiah. “They have healed the wound of my people lightly, saying
'Peace, Peace,' where there is no peace.”

Joy Kogawa

Government Bungling Confuses Canadians on Chinese Head Tax/Exclusion Redress: 4,000 Head Tax Payers and Families Call for a Just and Honourable Redress Now


Media Release: November 24, 2005  –  For Immediate Release

Government Bungling
Confuses Canadians on Chinese Head Tax/Exclusion Redress: 4,000 Head
Tax Payers and Families Call for a Just and Honourable Redress Now

Vancouver – The federal government is poised to sign an agreement with
the National Congress of Chinese Canadians (NCCC) that humiliates and
disrespects the few remaining Head Tax payers and their spouses. 
Community groups say the NCCC is not representative of the Chinese
Canadians calling on the government to engage in a genuine process of
redress and reconciliation.  Only good faith negotiations with
representatives for the last surviving Head Tax payers and spouses who
are in the 90's or older will bring about the long overdue
reconciliation and healing.

“We would all agree that Canada is a better country today because of
the legacy of the Japanese Canadian redress. In that light, we
respectfully request that the Prime Minister review the deliberations
taking place regarding Bill C-333 and re-engage in negotiations with
active participation of all Chinese Canadian communities,” said Grace
Eiko  Thomson of the National Association of Japanese
Canadians.  “Only a just and honourable settlement can bring about
a healing process leading to full participation and pride in Canadian
citizenship.”

Since 1984, over 4,000 Head Tax payers, spouses and families, each with
Head Tax certificate, registered with the Chinese Canadian National
Council (CCNC) to represent their claim to the Government.  The
CCNC was not consulted about the agreement because the government set
preconditions of “no apology” and “no compensation”. This was
unacceptable to those seeking direct individual acknowledgement,
recognition and a tax refund.

“Paul Martin is doing the same to the aboriginal community at the First
Minister   Conference: luring native elites and chiefs into
accepting a dollar cap for a Ten Year Plan without consultation with
grassroots groups and victims of residential schools,” said Bill Chu,
chairperson of Chinese Christians in Action and Canadians for
Reconciliation.  “It is shameful that a Chinese group (NCCC) with
little history of fighting for Head Tax redress bypassed consulting the
victims and is willing to accept whatever small funds offered with no
intent of paying the actual victims.”

“As Canadians, we should have the courage to face our past wrong-doings
including the imposition of head tax and the Chinese Exclusion
Act.  We should also urge our government to redress the head tax
payers and families,” said Thekla Lit, a human rights and peace
activist.  “Before anyone or group benefits from the money
established because of the injustice to Chinese pioneers, they have the
moral obligation to ensure the head tax payers, spouses and families
get their refund of head tax first.”

“The Chinese head tax redress has been dragged on for over a quarter of
a century.  We shouldn't rush to an unjust settlement because of a
upcoming election, said Gabriel Yiu, current affairs commentator. 
“By shutting out the Chinese Canadian National Council, who represents
over 4,000 redress claimants, the Liberal government is adding another
disgraceful chapter to our national history.”

“There is much anger and frustration at the federal government. 
Before his election to the Commons, current Multiculturalism Minister
Raymond Chan supported Head Tax payers, spouses and descendants at
Chinese Canadian National Council meetings,” said Sid Tan of the B. C.
Coalition of Head Tax Payers, Spouses and Descendants, director of CCNC
and a grandson of  a Head Tax payer.  “His proposed agreement
with the NCCC is unethical and humiliates the very people who overcame
the racist legislation to enable him to serve in public office.”

The B. C. Coalition of Head Tax Payers Spouses and Descendants are head
Tax payers, their surviving spouses, descendants and supporters. 
They are joined in their demand for a just and honourable redress now
by the Ontario Coalition of Head Tax Payers and Families, Chinese
Canadian National Council, Chinese Canadian Redress Alliance, the
Association of Chinese Canadians for Equality and Solidarity Society
and the Metro Toronto Chinese and South East Asian Legal Clinic.

Go to www.headtaxredress.org to sign the on-line petition to stop the
proposed agreement between the federal government and NCCC. 
Without proper consultation with the over 4000 Head Tax payers and
families registered with CCNC, any agreement on the on the Chinese Head
Tax/Exclusion redress and reconciliation will be unethical.

-30-

Sid Tan, co-ordinator  604-433-6169
B. C. Coalition of Head Tax Payers, Spouses and Descendants

CBC Radio story on Head Tax issue – interview with Sid Tan of BC Coalition of Head Tax Payers and Descendants

CBC Radio story on Head Tax issue – interview with Sid Tan of BC Coalition of Head Tax Payers and Descendants

CBC Radio has a story on their website
Compensation deal reached on Chinese head tax

Last updated
Nov 18 2005 01:12 PM PST
CBC News

Ottawa is set to pay millions of dollars in compensation to descendants
of Chinese workers who were charged a head tax to enter the country.
The government has agreed to acknowledge the tax was discriminatory and
will pay $12.5 million into a new foundation. The agreement comes
following negotiations with the the National Congress of Chinese
Canadians, a group appointed to negotiate redress.

“We have concluded the negotiations and now we are looking forward to
signing the agreement with the federal government as soon as possible,”
said Pin Tan, of the Congress.

The federal government imposed a $50 head tax on Chinese immigrants in
1885 after Chinese workers were no longer needed to work on the
Canadian Pacific Railway. The amount was raised to $500 in 1903. In 1923 the head tax
was replaced by the Exclusion Act, which barred Chinese immigrants from
the country altogether until 1947. The tax was the equivalent of about
two years' wages at the time. About 80,000 Chinese were singled out.
It wasn't fully repealed until 1967.
“The cabinet has approved an acknowledgment, commemoration and
education program to make sure that Canadians understand those issues,
those wrong things that were done to the communities in the past,” said
Raymond Chan, Minister of State for Multiculturalism. However, some head tax payers and their families are upset
with the deal. The Ontario Coalition of Head Tax Payers and Families,
which is representing 4,000 of them, is questioning why it has been
shut out of negotiations with the government.
It is demanding individual payments to Chinese who were charged the tax.
“We think that no money should go out until it is settled,” said Susan
Eng, of the coalition. “There is widespread opposition in the Chinese
community.”

The group is planning to sue the government to stop the deal. It says
every Chinese-Canadian who paid the price for decades of discrimination
should be given the chance to be heard.
The Congress said it is willing to hear proposals about how the money should be spent.
But the Canadian Taxpayers Federation is opposed to any money being paid out.
“The danger is that it fosters other groups to come forward and also
demand compensation and tax money,” said John Williamson, of the
Federation. “We'd kind of get into a cycle whereby it's one group after
another.”

NDP calls on government to provide fair deal for Chinese head tax payers


Gim Wong with Jack Layton above right.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

NOVEMBER 22, 2005

NDP CALLS ON GOVERNMENT TO PROVIDE FAIR DEAL FOR CHINESE HEAD TAX PAYERS

OTTAWA
NDP Leader Jack Layton along with his caucus colleagues, House Leader
Libby Davies (Vancouver East), Immigration Critic Bill Siksay
(Burnaby-Douglas) and MP Peter Julian (Burnaby-New-Westminster), urged
the Prime Minister to find a compromise and fair deal for all Chinese
Canadian head tax payers and their families, today.

These families deserve an apology and real respect from this government, said Layton. In a letter to the Prime Minister, the Federal NDP questioned the governments
reasoning in allocating $12.5 million for a redress project to a single
organization without including thousands of head tax payers, their
families and their representatives.

It
is completely inadequate for this government to exclude at least 4000
head tax payers, their families and descendants through a lump sum
agreement with only one organization,
said Davies.

$12.5 million has
been allocated to Chinese Canadians through the Acknowledgement,
Commemoration and Education (ACE) Fund, established for communities
affected by wartime and similar past measures. The government is
expected to announce Wednesday that it will sign over the entire
allocation to the National Congress of Chinese Canadians, despite calls
from several other organizations, such as the Chinese Canadian National
Council, to be involved in any commemorative, educational or other key
measures that may arise from the fund.

At
the forefront of the redress movement is the Chinese Canadian National
Council, which represents thousands of head tax payers and their
families,
said Layton, but if this deal goes forward in its current form, CCNC will have no say in how the funds will be spent.

The
Prime Minister should remember his responsibility to find a course of
compromise that will address the needs of the diverse community of
Chinese Canadians that deserve to be acknowledged here,
said Julian.

Finding
a compromise to address the injustices committed against Chinese
immigrants to Canada over a period of decades should be this government
s first priority, added Siksay.

The Canadian government collected $23 million from Chinese Immigrants to Canada between 1885 and 1923.

-30-

For more information, please contact:

Jack Layton Karl Belanger: (613) 995-6767

Libby Davies Leanne Holt: (613) 992-6036

Bill Siksay Sonja vanDieen: (613) 996-5599

Peter Julian Henri Sader: (613) 992-4215

_____________________________________________

From:   Julian, Peter – M.P. 

Sent:   November 23, 2005 10:45 AM

Subject:        Bill C-333, Chinese Canadian Recognition and Redress Act

Importance:     High

Thank you for
contacting my office with your concerns about the government amendments
to Bill C-333, Chinese Canadian Recognition and Redress Act.

BC NDP Caucus member
Libby Davies has brought forward several amendments to this Bill to try
to ensure that Head Tax Payers and their families were properly
represented.  Unfortunately, the Liberal and Conservatives
representatives on this committee voted against all amendments that the
NDP has put forward on this Bill.

You can rest assured
that my Caucus colleagues and myself will continue to push for changes
to this Bill that will acknowledge the mistakes the past government
made by imposing this tax, and for the Bill to be more inclusive of
Head Tax Payers and their families.

Yours sincerely,

Peter Julian, MP

Burnaby-New Westminster

Tel: (613) 992-4214  Fax: (613) 947-9500

Tel: (604) 775-5707  Fax: (604) 775-5743

TTY: (613) 992-4249

CEP 232/SCEP 232

Chinese Head Tax: NCCC Director Openly Reprimands NCCC for Mishandling Head Tax Issue


Chinese Head Tax:
NCCC
Director Openly Reprimands NCCC for Mishandling Head Tax Issue



The
following article appeared on November 19, in Ming Pao, under a

photograph
of Tsai Fung Chan Lee, Har Ying Lee, and Jie Jun Zhang Yan.

NCCC
Director Openly Reprimands NCCC for Mishandling Head Tax Issue

NCCC
director Tsai Fung Chan Lee went public in her opposition to NCCC,
openly
criticizing NCCC's approach, and urged its executive chairman Ping Tan
and
the federal government to reconsider their approach to the Head Tax issue.

Tsai
Fung Chan Lee is also the chairwoman of the Association for

Promoting
 Chinese-Canadian Friendship (Zhong Jia
Lian Yi Hui). She stated
yesterday
that for many years NCCC has done a good job promoting friendship between
China
and Canada.  However, it has handled the
Head Tax issue in inappropriate

ways.

She
states that it was the Head Tax payers who actually paid, if the

government
is to redress the Head Tax issue in anyway, the money should go to the
payers
and their families. It should be up to the payers and their families to
decide
whether to donate the money to the community or to keep the money. It
should
be their choice.

Mrs.
Lee said, her own father-in-law and elder brother-in-law had been

Head
Tax payers. When her father-in-law could not afford to pay any more Head
Tax,
his wife was forced to stay in China to look after two sons, and for forty
years
led a widow's existence with a living husband. It was clearly a tragic
story
of tears and hurt.

Mrs.
Lee clearly states that she is going public and speaking up in the
hope
that Ping Tan, NCCC, and the federal government would do some clear
thinking,
and reconsider the way the Head Tax issue is being handled.

Also,
Jie Jun Zhang Yan, founder of the Association of Guangzhou High
School
Alumni In Canada, states that she is puzzled by the federal
government's
attitude towards Canadians of Chinese descent. She cannot understand
why
compensation cannot go to the victims - the Head Tax payers. She
appeals
for the government to appoint a government spokesperson to explain the
government
stand.

Letter to the Sun: Chinese head tax redress Bill C-333 is an affront to justice


Letter to the Vancouver Sun : Chinese head tax redress Bill C-333 is an affront to justice

RE: The liberals bungle a great opportunity to do the right thing.
By Brad Lee
Saturday Nov 19th, page C7

Bill C-333 is an affront to justice


I am a 5th Generation Chinese Canadian.
Bill C-333 is an affront to justice and Canadian values.

Every year my WW2 vet grand uncle writes to the government asking for an apology.  Ain’t going to happen.

Raymond Chan is making secret deals with the National Congress of
Chinese Canadians
–this group does not accurately represent actual head
tax payers nor their descendants – the Chinese Canadian National
Council
does.  Chan and the NCCC are basically all immigrants that came
to Canada after 1967.  The head tax was last paid in 1923, before the
Chinese exclusion act closed the doors until 1947.  These guys just
want the $12.5 million.

1 – Chinese had to pay the head tax – no other ethnic or racial group was taxed.
2 – We endured over a century's worth of
racial discrimination and prejudice.
3) The government is ignoring us, and speaking to immigrants who did not pay the head tax.

The majority of head tax descendants are multi-generational Canadians
who all speak English, eh? – Why is Chan only talking to Chinese media?

It’s time for all Chinese-Canadians to wake up and protest. 
Register on-line as a headtax descendant.  The liberals are giving away OUR money that our ancestors sweated for.

Todd Wong aka “Toddish McWong”

www.gunghaggisfatchoy.com

Send a letter to the federal Liberal government to protest the unfair redress to head tax payers and descendants


Send a letter to the federal Liberal government to protest the unfair redress to head tax payers and descendants

http://www.headtaxredress.org/

Here is my letter.

I am a 5th Generation Chinese Canadian.
And I will NOT vote Liberal if Bill C-333 goes ahead.
I will tell all my friends and family to do the same.

Chinese Canadian pioneers are being discriminated against 3 times over.

1 – Chinese had to pay the head tax – no other ethnic or racial group was taxed.
2 – We endured over a century's worth of racial discrimination and prejudice.
3) The government is ignoring us, and speaking to new immigrants who did not pay the head tax.

The Government must recognize that it was a Liberal government that
brought in the Head Tax, and it was a Liberal government that is
ignoring the Canadian born descendants of the head tax payers.

The Government’s actions to date have been to silence and ignore head
tax families and groups representing them who refuse to accept the
Government’s preset conditions of  “no apology, no
compensation”  for 62 years of legislated racism;

Tthe Government is poised to allocate $12.5 million from the ACE
Program to the Congress, so that funds will be distributed through only
the Congress, to resolve the Head Tax and Exclusion Act issue, despite
loud opposition from head tax payers and families across Canada who
declare that the Congress is not representative of Chinese Canadians,
WE, the Undersigned, state that Government’s process of appointing the
Congress is anti-democratic and that any payment to the National
Congress of Chinese Canadians is illegitimate without proper
consultation with head tax payers and families.

THEREFORE, the Government MUST:
STOP any and all payments from the ACE Program to the Congress; and
immediately commence negotiations with head tax payers and families and
their legitimately appointed representatives.
     
Send your own letter to www.headtaxredress.org

HEAD TAX redress: Sunday meeting + Vancouver Sun letter by Brad Lee


HEAD TAX redress: Sunday meeting + Vancouver Sun letter by Brad Lee

The Vancovuer Sun printed a letter today by 5th Generation
Canadian Brad Lee of Toronto.  Brad is reflecting the simmering
anger by many Chinese Canadians that the Liberal government is giving
money “in the name of head tax redress” to groups NOT even actually
connected to actual head tax payers and their descendants.

Multicultural minister Raymond Chan is an immigrant Chinese and he is
giving money to other immigrant Chinese groups and courting Chinese
media when all the head tax payer descendants are now multigenerational
Canadians and are reached through Mainstream media.

Here's what we can do about it.

1 – write and phone your MP – tell them you are not happy with their
idea of “redress”.  Tell them you will not vote Liberal.  Click on www.headtaxredress.org

2 – Come to a B. C. Coalition of Head Tax Payers, Spouses
and Descendants meeting Sunday November 20, 2005 to update our seniors
on the redress campaign and consult with the group. At 1:30pm at Quan Lung Sai
Tong at 164 E. Hastings Street west of Carnegie Centre at Main Street.

Here's the letter by Brad Lee.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 
Vancouver Sun; Date:2005 Nov 19; Section:Observer; Page Number:
C7

The
Liberals bungle a great opportunity to do the right thing



Brad Lee



  
Let this go down in history: Paul Martin’s Liberals had an opportunity
to correct past injustices involving decades of legislated racism
against the Chinese in this country.

  
Instead, they are bungling it.

  
In their headlong rush to purchase goodwill among voters ahead of an
election, through multimillion-dollar deals in principle with the
Ukrainians, the Italians and other groups close to political noliability
settlements, the Liberals have cast aside the language and intent of
true reconciliation and redress.

  
Witness Bill C-333, the so-called “Immigrants of Chinese Origin
Exclusionary Measures Recognition Act,” now wending its way toward third
reading in Parliament, after breezing through final amendments at the
Liberal-dominated standing committee on heritage.

  
In just two meetings of the committee, a strange cabal of Liberals and
Tories managed to do away with wording acknowledging the injustices of
the head tax on Chinese immigrants, from 1885 to 1923, and the Chinese
Exclusion Act (1923-1947.)

  
Historians who review the implications of Bill C-333 on social justice
will not see words like “unjust,” “discrimination,” “racism,” nor any of
their derivatives. Equally, they will see no evidence of
“reconciliation,” “redress,” “reparations” or “compensation.”

  
Further investigation will show missteps by Martin’s Liberals in
drafting amendments to the private member’s bill simply to avoid any
hint of government liability. The backward reasoning for watering down
the text and intent of the bill is that the head tax and Exclusion Act
were legal at the time so the government bears no actual responsibility
for what happened.

  
(Never mind that the $500 my grandfather paid to enter Canada, along
with the varying amounts
from more than
82,000 other Chinese, had generated $23 million by 1923 for government
coffers. In contrast, non-Chinese immigrants were offered a
quarter-section of land to settle here.)

  
“In each case the attorney-general of Canada, on behalf of the
government of Canada, disagreed with the arguments made on the basis
that what was done during the two wars, and either under the War
Measures Act in the case of the Germans and Italians, and under a
variety of immigration acts in the case of the Chinese, that all those
measures were perfectly legal,” according to Canadian Heritage legal
counsel Michel Francoeur.

  
Would Canadian justices trying the cases of genocide in war-torn
countries, or even historians looking back at the roots of the
Holocaust, accept this reasoning?

  
Adding insult to century-old injury, the Liberals have also insisted on
naming a single group, the National Congress of Chinese Canadians formed
in 1991 and hardly representative of the broader community, as the
government’s sole partner on projects to recognize past “exclusionary
measures.”

  
All this because the NCCC’s leaders have agreed to the Liberals’
position of “no apology, no compensation.” As well, due diligence on
this group has been set aside in favour of political expediency.
Meanwhile, the Chinese Canadian National Council, which has
regis
tered more than
4,000 head-tax payers and their families since 1984, has been refused a
seat at the reconciliation table.

  
Our historians may note misgivings about Bill C-333 voiced by MP Libby
Davies (NDP—Vancouver East) and echoed by Bloc Quebecois MPs Maka Kotto
(Saint-Lambert) and Meili Faille (Vaudreuil-Soulanges.)

  
“As far as saying we can only name one organization because they’re the
only ones who are willing to work with the government under the terms
set by the government, I mean what is that about?” Davies asked.

  
“Is that how we do our business?
That only if you
agree beforehand that these are the terms you get to participate in the
process. That’s not my understanding of parliamentary democracy.”

  
But with Martin’s Liberals it has always been about the money.

  
For weeks, officials at Canadian Heritage have been negotiating a
$12.5-million payment to the NCCC in the matter of recognizing the
imposition of exclusionary measures on Chinese Canadians.

  
According to Chinese media, the plan is for the prime minister to travel
to Vancouver, after the first ministers’ meeting in Kelowna next week to
announce the deal at the NCCC’s national conference.

  
Similar to a redress package unveiled last weekend for redress of the
Italian Canadians over internment during the Second World War, there
will be much handshaking and many smiles for the cameras. Martin might
even repeat his comment that, “You know as well as I do it’s not enough
to remember the past — you have to learn from it.”

  
Problem is, the prime minister and his party are still foggy on the
details.

  
Brad Lee is Chinese-Canadian. His

family has been in
Canada for five generations. He lives in Toronto.




MARK VAN
MANEN/VANCOUVER SUN FILES Vancouver’s Charlie Quan displays, nearly 80
years later, the admission papers he paid $500 for in 1923.