Monthly Archives: January 2006

Hanson Lau press conference: PM's apology “not good enough”


Hanson Lau press conference: PM's apology “not good enough”

Hanson Lau held a press conference Thursday morning with
representatives from the head tax survivor and descendant community,
such as John Wong and Foon Chan – all seniors whose respective
grandfather and father-in-law had paid the head tax, and whose families
were separated by the Chinese Exclusion Act.

All said that Paul Martin's “apology was not good enough”

“If Paul Martin is really sincere, he should commit to making a formal
apology in the House of Commons,” said John Wong – a head tax
descendant who grew up separated from his father because of the
Exclusion Act, and was only able to come to Canada in the late 1950's.

Hanson Lau
was a radio commentator when he first invited people to bring head tax
certificates to his office, in the 1980's, and helped to lead the head
tax redress movement at the time.  He is featured and interviewed
in the NFB film directed by Karen Cho, In the Shadow of Gold Mountain, which will again be shown this Sunday at 10pm PST on CBC Newsworld.

More related stories in the media are reporting that many Chinese Canadians are unhappy with Martin's  head tax apology

Apology unwelcome
24 Hours Vancouver, Canada
Mr. Martin's apology is very insincere,” said Hanson Lau, a former Chinese radio broadcaster involved in the head tax redress movement.

Political debate heats up over Chinese head tax
CBC News, Canada – 12 hours ago
A
federal Liberal cabinet minister says he's changed his mind and
Chinese-Canadians who paid the head tax to enter Canada should receive
an official apology


Martin's apology for head tax 'just the beginning' for voters
Globe and Mail, Canada
medals to the headtax payers equivalent in value to $500. Since the 1980s, former radio commentator Hanson Lau said there was always demand for an apology and

PM sorry for head tax Globe and Mail

Takao Tanabe, one of Canada's greatest artists, on display now at Centre A in Vancouver

Takao Tanabe, one of Canada's greatest artists, on display now at Centre A in Vancouver


FOR IMMEDIATE
RELEASE

 

Centre A presents

 

 

TAKAO
TANABE

 

Banners & Banner Paintings 1969
– 1973

 

EXHIBITION: January 7 – February 18,
2006

 

RECEPTION: Sunday, January 29, 2-5
pm

 

Free parking lot at 23 West
Pender

 

Exhibition Sponsor: Anndraya T.
Luui

 

Centre A is honoured to host a solo
exhibition by one of Canada’s greatest artists, Takao
Tanabe. The exhibition features a series of over 30 banners and banner
paintings. These dramatic works make full use of Centre A’s high ceiling and
open space. The exhibition coincides with Tanabe’s career retrospective, opening
at the Vancouver
Art Gallery on January 21. Centre A will host
a public reception with the artist in attendance on Sunday afternoon, January
29, to coincide with Chinatown celebrations of
the Year of the Dog.

 

Tanabe’s banners maintain a strong
contemporary edge even after thirty years. He started making them in the late
1960s, a time of great change in the arts, when painting seems literally to be
leaping off the wall. Commissions to produce banners for public spaces in
Regina and Winnipeg inspired him to explore other
applications of the form. Some were painted on canvas, while others were made in
collaboration with a commercial flag maker in New York. These works on nylon are translucent
and in some cases over 16 feet long. Seen from behind they look like stained
glass windows.

 

Born in Seal Cove, a fishing village
near Prince Rupert,
BC, Takao Tanabe has been a leader
in Canadian art for half a century. He represented Canada at the
Sao Biennale of 1953 and has been going strong ever since. He is a master
painter whose astonishing career includes a wide range of styles. For many years
he was Head of the Art Program at the Banff School of Fine Arts, where he
influenced many younger artists. He is a recipient of the Governor General’s
Award and the Order of Canada. His work is represented by the Equinox Gallery
where it will be featured in an exhibition opening on February
15.

 

Centre A is pleased to be mounting
this exhibition in cooperation the Vancouver Art
Gallery, continuing a
tradition of collaboration between the two
organizations.

 

We are extremely grateful to the
President of Centre A’s Board of Directors, Anndraya T. Luui, for her generous
sponsorship of this exhibition.

 

Centre A acknowledges the generous
support of patrons, sponsors, members, partners, private foundations, and
government funding agencies, including the Canada Council for the Arts, the
British Columbia Arts Council, and the City of Vancouver through the Office of Cultural
Affairs.

 

Centre A

Vancouver International Centre for
Contemporary Asian Art

2 West Hastings Street, Vancouver, BC,
Canada
, V6B 1G6

t. 604-683-8326; f.
604-683-8632

centrea@centrea.orgwww.centrea.org

Gallery Hours: Tuesday-Saturday,
11am-6pm




A real Head Tax apology should Stand On Guard for True Patriot Love – instead of a Chinaman's Chance for fair redress.


A real Head Tax apology should Stand On Guard for True Patriot Love – instead of a Chinaman's Chance for fair redress.

Here is my re-written and more thoughtfully edited response to the Tyee Election Blog article by Richard Warnika  Head Tax Apology Falls Flat

The “word on the street” is that the entire head tax redress positioning by the Liberals, has been dumbfounding.  When the Liberals released the November 26th Agreement-in-Principle for redress of immigration and internment issues, they only negotiated with organizations that would agree to their preconditions of “No Apology” and “No compensation.”  

But now they have flip flopped the day after it is reported that the Conservatives are leading over them.  This is like the school yard bully who refuses to apologize after it was proven that he stole your lunch money, but only “apologizes” through an intermediary, when he is pressed after realizing he is no longer popular:

“I regret for your loss, and I have deep sorrow, it was a terrible thing”… than later says, “Do I regret that? The answer is Yes.  do I apologize? Yes.  I don't know how anyone could not regret what occured.”

A true and sincere apology would be:

“I'm sorry that I have been deliberately mean to you, and put you through so much misery and humiliation, forced you into poverty, denied you equal opportunity, and refused to apologize or make compensation. Please, how can I make it up to you.”

My initial response to the apology can be found on my blog article: “Did Paul Martin Really Apologize or did he duck?  If it waddles like an apology, and it quacks like an apology… it must be a duck!
The original November 26th announcement was also accompanied by a list of 260+ organizations that were being “represented” by the four signatory organizations of the Chinese Canadian Military Museum, Chinese Cultural Centre of Greater Toronto, and the Montreal Chinese Cultural Centre (which has been admitted to be a non-entity), and the National Congress of Chinese Canadians, which only has a website in Chinese (go figure!) Check this Epoch Times article, Head Tax Still a Headache regarding the controversies.

Many organizations' names were repeated on the list, and many have since asked to be removed for various reasons.  Only 3 organizations actively have anything to do with Chinese-Canadian historical programming.  The Chinese Canadian National Council – which was listed by mistake – because they have always asked for an apology and for individual compensation, the Chinese Canadian Veterans Association – who have always asked for an apology. The Chinese Cultural Centre in Vancouver came under some controversy
when their President admitted that she did not consult or inform her
board.

The veterans only agreed to the No Apology, because they were told that “Acknowledgement” is like an “Apology” and because they would like to see some settlement before the remaining members die.  These are Canadians of Chinese ancestry who went to fight for Canada in WW2 in the hopes that they could prove their loyalty to Canada and somehow argue for voting francise for all Chinese-Canadians.  This is not the way to treat our respected elders. Click here for a Vancouver Courier Story featuring my grand-uncle Daniel Lee asking for an apology

I am 5th generation Canadian, a descendant of Rev. Chan Yu Tan.  He was a Christian missionary who taught English to the Chinese immigrants, and always told his family to learn the Canadian ways.  In every subsequent generation there has been inter-racial marriage with caucasian-Canadians.  We have an Indian Chief, and a Miss Canada runner up in our family.  All my maternal cousins have married caucasians.  We are Canadian.  

We deserve better than an off-the-cuff remark on ethnic radio, when his polls are slipping.

It's about standing on guard for true patriot love – instead of a “Chinaman's Chance” for fair redress.

The Tyee: Head-tax apology falls flat – I explain why many Chinese-Canadians are “not impressed” by Paul Martin's apology

image

The Tyee: Head-tax apology falls flat – I explain why many Chinese-Canadians are “not impressed” by Paul Martin's apology

Richard Warnica of The Tyee telephoned me on Thursday asking for my take on Paul Martin's “apology” which I wrote on my blog titled Did Paul Martin really apologize for Head Tax or did he duck? 

Head-tax apology falls flat

Paul Martin got a lot of press today for apologizing, in a Fairchild radio interview, for the head – tax imposed on Chinese immigrants until 1923.

The issue has nagged the Liberals for the whole campaign, and I won’t rehash the whole deal here. (You can read about it here)

But until Tuesday, the government line was
that an apology would expose the government to massive liability, an
opinion they’ve now, apparently, dropped.

I first read about the issue on Gung Haggis Fat Choy,
a local blog written by Todd Wong, a Vancouver community activist. I
called Wong to ask him about the apology; he was not impressed. Why?

For the rest of the article… go to here

Winnipeg Sun: Chinese 'feel betrayed' by Liberals

Chinese 'feel betrayed' by Liberals
John Gleeson, Winnipeg Sun
January 5, 2006

If you want to take a measure of declining Liberal fortunes in the latter
half of the election campaign, look no further than Canada's
Chinese-Canadian community.

One million strong, Chinese-Canadians have long been counted on by
Liberal politicians to “deliver the vote” in the Grit strongholds of
Toronto and Vancouver. This time around, they could be the key to Paul
Martin's defeat on Jan. 23.

Just ask Susan Eng, co-chair of the nonpartisan Ontario Coalition of Head
Tax Payers and Families, whether she has noticed a shift away from
traditional Liberal support in Toronto's Chinese-Canadian community.

“You had better believe it!” Eng says.

She cites the head tax issue — which the Liberals “have handled very
badly” — as the key reason.

“It has wakened up the Chinese-Canadian community like nothing else. I
have been blown over by how avid the Chinese-language media has been over
it.”

But that's not all. The revelation that a senior Ontario Liberal
“jokingly” compared NDP candidate Olivia Chow to a dog on his website
has “done huge damage” to the Liberals, Eng says.

“Absolutely, absolutely,” she says. “I was born in Canada but just
listening to my parents talk about it — when you call somebody a dog in
Chinese culture, it's pretty low down. It's meant and only meant as a
deep insult.

“When you call someone trailer trash, everyone will cringe. It's that
kind of comment.”

And like other past Liberal voters, many Chinese-Canadians are put off,
says Eng, by “that arrogance — that sense of entitlement.”

The Liberals, she says, “felt they owned the (Chinese-Canadian) vote and
a lot of people in the community gave them that loyalty. Now they feel
betrayed — that they've been taken for granted.”

The head tax issue is a hot button for Chinese-Canadians. After
thousands of Chinese railway workers lost their lives building Canada's
“national dream,” the government tried to close the door to new Chinese
immigrants by imposing first a discriminatory head tax and then the
openly racist Chinese Exclusion Act, which separated some families for a
generation until it was repealed in 1947.

Promising to take appropriate steps to acknowledge this historic wrong,
Paul Martin's Liberals added insult to injury last year by refusing to
formally apologize or to even meet with the estimated 250 head tax
survivors, now in their nineties, to discuss a fair settlement.

Instead, in what can only be called true Grit fashion, the Liberals
announced they would hand $2.5 million over to the National Congress of
Chinese Canadians, a group that has no links to the head tax survivors or
the 20-year fight for redress — but does have plenty of ties to the
Liberal Party of Canada (and Martin's preferred trading partner, the
People's Republic of China).

Conservative Leader Stephen Harper has — once again — taken a more
“compassionate Canadian” position on the issue than the Liberals,
pledging both fairly negotiated redress and an official apology if the
Tories form the next government. “He was first out of the gate,” says
Eng.

Martin, of course, now out to save his bacon at any cost, can be
expected to promise anything to shore up critical Liberal support. Don't
be surprised if he promises to bring every Chinese head tax payer back to
life so he can apologize to each one in person. But, as with so many
Liberal misfires in this election campaign, Martin was caught showing his
party's arrogant disdain — and all the desperate, belated promises in
the world won't change that.

Whether it will be enough to “turn” a significant number of
Chinese-Canadian votes away from the Liberals remains an open question.
But one thing it has done, say those inside the community, is galvanize
Chinese-Canadian voters like never before.

“This is probably the first time in history that the Chinese will be able
to feel that their vote will make a difference,” says Raymond Lee, past
president of Sien Lok Society of Calgary.

About time, isn't it?

John Gleeson is the editor of the Winnipeg Sun. He can be reached by
e-mail at: jgleeson@wpgsun.com

Letters to the editor should be sent to letters@wpgsun.com.

Did Paul Martin really apologize for Head Tax or did he duck? If it waddles like an apology, and it quacks like an apology – then it's a duck!

image
Did Paul Martin really apologize for Chinese Canadian Head Tax? or did he duck…
If it waddles like an apology, and it quacks like an apology…  then it's a duck!

I
listened to 1320 AM Radio at 6pm on Wednesday. It is a Chinese language
station and I don't even speak Chinese.  They had clips of Paul
Martin's January 4th visit to Vancouver.  The Chinese media cornered
him, and asked him about the community demands for an apology for
Chinese Canadian head tax.

When
speaking to Fairchild Radio Vancouver (AM 1470) yesterday, Prime
Minister Paul Martin said, “Do I regret that?  The answer is
Yes.  Do I apologize? Yes.  I don't know how anyone could not
regret what occured.”

So now… “I have deep sorrow” translates to “I am sorry???
According
to Roy Miki's book “Redress: Inside the Japanese Canadian Call for
Justice, the word “regret” is used to avoid legal liability.

The real regret is that the Liberals did not come straight out with a
fair and inclusive redress package for Chinese Canadians, when they
signed the Novemeber 26th, Agreement-in-Principle for the ACE
(Acknowledgement, Commemoration, and Education).  The Liberals
deliberately did not include consulting with the Chinese Canadian
National Council and the 4000+ head tax payers, spouses and descendants
that the CCNC registered over the past 20 years.

 It is only due to the diligence of community activists and
Chinese media that the Liberals have now moved from their No Apology
position.

Also on the program, I heard the Liberal
MP (Stephen Owen or was it Ujjal Dosanjh?) saying the Prime Minister
speaks for Canada, and he speaks for the Liberal Party – so you heard
him make an apology….  so I hope it's over with, and I don't want to
hear any more about it… (not exact quotes).

One sound-bite on radio does not an apology make.
Hmmm….
sounds to me like the Liberals are still trying to spin their words
into votes… but I thought that Rapunzel spinning straw into gold was
only a fairy tale???

Ujjal Dosanjh also emphasized his presnt position on redress  is still the same as when
he was a BC NDP cabinet minister – that redress is necessary.  And
said he
will be an advocate for an inclusive process and apology.  It was
Dosanjh that moved the motion to ask the Federal Govnment to initiate
and resolve Chinese Head Tax and Exclusion Act issues.


So if the PM has now made an un-official apology, and plans to make an
official apology in the House of Parliament after he is re-elected….

Does this now invalidate the  Nov 26th Agreement-in-Principle?
Because now, the Liberals have reneged on the pre-conditions of No Apology. 
Will they now also reverse their position on No Individual compensation by making a tax refund?

Apology
(sort of) made….  but saying it only on Chinese language radio
and to ALL Canadians at a media conference for ALL media is a different
thing.  As a 5th generation Canadian of Chinese ancestry, I know
that English is the main language for the vast majority of head tax
descendants.  If the Prime Minister wants to reach us, the
survivors, spouse and descendants of head tax payers – then he must
adress us through English language media.

Wednesday night's Global
Television News reported that “Martin apologizes to Chinese Canadians
for head tax.”  And said this story would be published in tomorrow's
Vancouver Sun.

This
“apology” clearly shows that the Liberals are playing to the Chinese
language voters.  If they really and sincerely had wanted to apologize
for the head tax – then they would not have spent the last two months
saying there would be NO APOLOGY!  

Just yesterday on CKNW
radio, Minister of State (Multiculturalism) Raymond Chan told radio
host Bill Good, that an apology would open the government to
liability.  

Meanwhile,
Minister of Industry and leader of the fedreal
BC Liberal Caucus, David Emerson, says he supports an apology and that
he is not worried about legal ramifications.  In the Jan 4th Metro
Newspaper, Emerson said, “I'll be a pain in the neck to the
establishment if that's what it takes,” distancing himself from Chan's
longtime stance of “No Apology.”

So where does this leave Raymond Chan?  Definitely on the outside. Chan
is still repeating his statements of No Apology like a broken record.

He says he is waiting for a 2nd legal opinion before he changes his
mind.  Meanwhile… the world changes around Raymond, as one by one,
Emerson, Dosanjh and now Martin say that an apology must be made. I
think that “pride” is listed under one of the seven deadly sins.  But
can Chan understand the translation that “Pride” can be like an
“Acknowledgement.”

Next step – commitment to tearing up the November 26th AiP ACE program and start a new inclusive process.

Gee… Japanese Canadian redress negotiations all over again…
  • Government originally says No Negotiations.
  • The more activist groups
    wanting apology and compensation gets ignored.
  • Government
    works out settlement with one group that follows the governmentt line
    (in an effort for survivors to see some settlement before they died.) 
  • Voices rise in a now divided community, challenging groups validity to negotiate
  • Other established community groups challenge the acceptance of No Apology and No Individual Compensation,
  • Public
    pressure builds, until government finally negotiated the 1988
    settlement with both an Apology and individual compensation.


check out www.headtaxredress.org





CCNC Press Release: HARPER, LIBERAL CABINET MINISTERS SUPPORT APOLOGY FOR CHINESE HEAD TAX

image
Stephen
Harper is now going farther than Martin in apologizing… but Jack
Layton was really the first party  leader to call for an apology –
see the NDP press release from November…  NDP MP Libby Davies
has worked on this issue for years, following the pioneering work by
Margaret Mitchell in the 1980's.




FOR
IMMEDIATE RELEASE

 
 
HARPER,
LIBERAL CABINET MINISTERS SUPPORT APOLOGY FOR CHINESE HEAD
TAX

 
Toronto,
January 4,
2006
: Opposition
Leader Stephen Harper today called for an apology for the Chinese Head Tax and
Exclusion Act.

 
At his news
conference, in
Mississauga,
Ont., this morning, he stated: “It is tough to immigrate to
Canada
and it will probably never be easy. In the past it was harder, sometimes
unjustifiably unfair. That's why, for example, our Chinese Canadian community
deserves an apology for the Head Tax and appropriate acknowledgement and
redress of that wrong.” 

 
Mr. Harper
was also the first party leader to issue formal support for head tax redress as
early as a Dec. 8, 2005, news release issued to foreclose any further support by
his Caucus member, Inky Mark [Dauphin–Swan River—Marquette] for the Liberal’s
much maligned position of “no apology, no compensation.”

 
Mr. Harper’s
comments, made as part of the Conservatives’ policy platform on immigration,
follows Industry Minister David Emerson, currently contesting the riding of
Vancouver-Kingsway where Chinese Canadians comprise 42% of the population, who
today repeated in the Globe and Mail that he’s prepared to support an apology
now that “he's heard from lawyers and the consensus is that an apology doesn't
imply liability.”

 
“We told
them from the beginning that the courts have ruled that there’s no legal
liability, but they also said there is a strong moral obligation to provide
redress,” said Avvy Go, legal counsel for the Ontario Coalition of Head Tax
Payers and Families. “This is just an excuse for the Liberals’ arrogant refusal
to apologize for 62 years of legislated racism.”

 
Health
Minister Ujjal Dosanjh also called for an apology and broader consultation
within the Chinese community presumably in answer to criticism that the group
picked by Multiculturalism Minister Raymond Chan to sign a rushed pre-election
deal was unrepresentative and head tax families were excluded from
consultations.

 
Prime
Minister Paul Martin has tried several times to state his “deep sorrow” and
finally in a radio interview on AM1470, when he was asked will he apologize, he
said, “Do I apologize? Yes, I don’t know how anyone could not regret what
occurred. The way to correct that wrong now is to place our focus now on
acknowledgement, commemoration and education.  We must recognize what
happened and ensure that never recurs – that’s where I think resources should be
concentrated.” 

 
“They’ve had
to be dragged kicking and screaming to just give an apology for the injustice –
and only because the issue has galvanized Chinese Canadian voters,” said Raymond
Lee, past president, Sien Lok Society of
Calgary.
“They have yet to agree to an all-party resolution to make the apology in the
House of Commons so that it is an official apology of the Government of
Canada.”

 
“They
finally appear to be ready to talk to head tax families. Let’s hope that means
there will be immediate redress for the approximately 250 head tax payers and
spouses still alive today,” said Bill Chu, spokesperson for the B.C. Coalition
of Chinese Head Tax Payers, Their Spouses and Descendants. “In fact, they could
just use the $2.5 million announced before the election to deal with the people
who lived through the years of isolation and exclusion because of that racist
legislation. They are all in their 90s now and should see justice while they are
still with us.”

 
Prime
Minister Martin has consistently refused to speak with James Wing, 94, a head
tax payer living in his riding of Lasalle-Emard in
Montreal
and his government has ignored requests from groups representing head tax payers
like Mr. Wing and their families to engage in open and transparent consultations
and negotiations.

 
“The process
of reconciliation cannot begin until the government deals directly with the
surviving head tax payers, their spouses and families,” said William Dere of the
Chinese Canadian Redress Alliance [
Montreal].
 
“After 20
years, the head tax campaign has finally gained some ground: all parties are
calling for an apology, most recognize the mistake of not consulting head tax
families, Chinese Canadian voters have been motivated across the country and
politicians are feeling their clout,” said Susan Eng, co-chair of the Ontario
Coalition. “But most important – because head tax redress is now clearly an
election issue – all Canadians are watching to see what the government,
regardless of who forms it, does to redress the injustice inflicted by
legislation on generations of Chinese Canadians.”

 
Canada's
“National
Dream” was realized when the Last Spike was driven to complete the
transcontinental railway in 1885. Instead of gratitude for the Chinese railway
workers – thousands of whom gave their lives to the building of this country –
the government imposed a head tax on all new Chinese immigrants, collecting more
than $23 million by 1923. That year, the government passed the Chinese Exclusion
Act to stop all Chinese immigration

to
Canada.
The racist legislation was not repealed until 1947.



–30–
 



MEDIA
CONTACTS:

 
Ontario
Coalition of Head Tax Payers and Families

(Toronto
and
Ottawa)
Susan Eng,
co-chair, (416) 960-0312

Avvy Go,
legal counsel, (647) 271-9357

           
Yew Lee, co-chair, (819) 827-3357

 
B.C.
Coalition of Chinese Head Tax Payers, Their Spouses and
Descendants

(Vancouver)
Bill Chu,
spokesperson, (604) 261-6526

 
Sien Lok
Society of
Calgary
(Calgary)
Raymond Lee,
past president, (403) 288-3903

 
Chinese
Canadian Redress
Alliance
(Montreal)
William
Dere, (514)
488-0804

Globe & Mail: Emerson backs head-tax compensation, Federal apology to Chinese would not lead to legal problems, minister now says

In
today's Globe & Mail…. an article by Petti Fong that shows MP
cabinet minister David Emerson breaking ranks with the Liberal Party….

Emerson backs head-tax compensation


Federal apology to Chinese would not lead to legal
problems, minister now says

VANCOUVER
— Senior B.C. Liberal David Emerson said he has changed his mind and now believes
the government should apologize to Chinese immigrants who paid $500 each to
enter the country.

Mr.
Emerson said he thought the head-tax issue had been resolved in the Chinese
community when the Liberal government, in its dying days in office, announced
it would give $2.5-million to fund education programs or postage stamps as
redress for the policy that singled out Chinese immigrants.

“I
was surprised it didn't get a more positive response. If we haven't got it
right, let's look at it and see if we can improve it,” Mr. Emerson said.
“I'm certainly hearing different opinions and getting different advice.
I'm getting new information and I'm willing to shift my ground.”

A
growing, angry chorus of Chinese-Canadian voters say the government should
apologize in addition to providing compensation to individuals. From the late
1880s into the 1920s, concerns that Chinese immigrants would take jobs away
from non-Chinese resulted in a government policy to charge a tax that was the
equivalent of two years of wages.

But
Multiculturalism Minister Raymond Chan and Liberal Leader Paul Martin
steadfastly refused to apologize, saying that would open the government up to
litigation.

That's an
argument Mr. Emerson no longer buys, he said yesterday. Like Mr. Chan, he is
running for re-election in a riding where he faces tough competition and where
more than 40 per cent of voters are of Chinese background.

Mr.
Emerson said he's heard from lawyers and the consensus is that an apology
doesn't imply liability. When he was in cabinet as Industry Minister, he said
that he believed a consensus had been reached with various Chinese community
groups and that the issue was resolved.

Mr.
Emerson said he plans to bring the matter up with Mr. Martin when the Liberal
Leader campaigns in the Lower Mainland this week. While he believes the
government should apologize, Mr. Emerson said, he is not convinced there should
be individual compensation.

Mr. Chan
dismissed his colleague's position yesterday, refusing to say any more about
the issue.

Ujjal Dosanjh,
the Health Minister, who is also running in a riding where 40 per cent of
voters are Chinese, said yesterday the government needs to talk to more people
in the Chinese community.

In 1992,
when he was an NDP member of the B.C. Legislature, Mr. Dosanjh
called for an apology and for the government to work with community groups to
reach a solution.

He said
yesterday that it now appears not enough consultation occurred before the
Liberals announced $50-million to redress historical grievances of seven ethnic
groups, including the Chinese.

“I
was given to understand there was significant consultation and broad consensus.
What I'm led to believe now is there is a need for broader consultation and
broader consensus,” Mr. Dosanjh said yesterday.
“I believe an apology has to be part of that.”

In an
interview with the daily Ming Pao, Mr. Martin indicated he's willing to speak
with the Chinese community, but did not directly answer the question about
whether the government should apologize and provide compensation.

“I strongly
believe that collecting head tax from Chinese immigration was wrong, morally
wrong,” Mr. Martin said in the interview last week. “I am in deep
sorrow over the head-tax history.”

Mr.
Martin also said his government is the first to address the issue and indicated
he will let both sides try to change his mind.

Sid Tan,
with the Chinese Canadian National Council, said yesterday that Mr. Emerson and
Mr. Dosanjh are recognizing a mistake was made in the
announcement.

“They're
piping up because they know this issue can hurt them politically,” he
said. “The private dignity of the Chinese community is exercising its
power as a voting block.”

 

Hey Mom! They printed a picture of me in Shared Vision magazine…



Hey Mom!  They printed a picture of me in Shared Vision magazine…

Okay…
it's January in Vancouver, BC, and the Gung Haggis Fat Choy season is
upon us now.  Welcome to the first print media sighting of this
phenomena known as Gung Haggis Fat Choy.

The first known media sighting is Anne Garber's Evalu8 Website.  Click on the little picture of “Gung Haggis” for the article.

Toddish McWong
Joe McDonald (in mask) holding his bagpipes, while Todd Wong plays accordion – photo Jaime Griffiths, courtesy of Todd Wong

GUNG HAGGIS FAT CHOY
For most of the year, Todd Wong is a
community activist who works on issues such as Chinese head-tax redress
and the preservation of the childhood home of author Joy Kogawa. Once a
year, however, the mild-mannered Wong transforms into Toddish McWong,
the host and organizer of Gung Haggis Fat Choy, a celebration of
Chinese and Scottish culture in honour of Chinese New Year and Robbie
Burns Day, which occur a few days apart. 

Check out the rest of the article at
http://www.shared-vision.com/2006/sv1901/calendar1901.html