Author Archives: Todd

CBC French Television: films Save Kogawa House committee in action at City Council Nov 3

CBC French Television: films Save Kogawa House committee in action at City Council Nov 3

Great News today!

Just watched Radio Canada – French television
Our segment looks GREAT!

We taped it! – now to digitalize and convert to a
webcast…  hmmm…. new technology….
I am having enough of a challenge working on the new weblog www.kogawahouse.com

Shots showed the house, Obasan cover, One Book One
Vancouver stickers, etc…

Short interviews with Todd, and Joy, pictures of
Ann-Marie, Diane Switzer, our lunch meeting at Kirin Restaurant with Marion Quednau, Jackie Byrn and my girlfriend Deb Martin.

And… it showed city councillors taking out their
wallets and donating immediately to the cause, led by
Councillor Raymond Louie's challenge for other councillors to meet his $100 donation.

Our committee worked well, and each speakers covered
their points, without any real overlaps.

Also this morning… CBC Radio had news segment with
interviews by Todd and Joy at 6:30, 7:30 and 8:30am.

All good work everybody!  Well Done!

Kogawa House: Vancouver Council votes unaminously to create 120 day delay to demolition application

Kogawa House: Vancouver Council votes unaminously to create 120 day delay to demolition application

GOOD NEWS today!

We had a good
committee presentation with good support from Vancouver Heritage
Foundation, Alliance for Arts and Culture, Writers Union of Canada and
Periodical Writers Association of Canada.

CBC Radio-Canada Television (french language) even showed up to film us
during our lunch meeting at Kirin Restaurant, as we made our
presentations, and as we shared congratulations with each other
afterwards.



Ann-Marie Metten of our Save Kogawa House committee wrote the following:

I'm just home from City Hall and am pleased to report a unanimous
decision in favour of staying demolition for 120 days beginning, not
today, but on November 30.

Jim Green amended the proposed motion with this delayed start date on
the basis that we have yet to receive a development permit application
from the owner, who did not attend today's meeting and did not send a
representative.

I suppose the November 30 start date also prevents any further motions
to council before the municipal election because they do not meet again
until November 28.

Excellent presentations today from the following:

* Gerry McGeough summarizing his administrative report

* Diane Switzer on the Vancouver Heritage Foundation's role as agent for charitable donations

* Heather Redfern, executive director of Alliance for Arts and Culture,
spoke on the support from Vancouver's arts community, that one of the
inaugural Vancouver Arts Awards grants was used to help develop the
opera Naomi's Road, and that is important for the Vancouver community
to recognize and give back to the Japanese Canadian community.

* Todd Wong on the history of our committee, the cultural significance
of the house and its place in Canada's multicultural society, and also
on the story of Naomi's Road as told in the operetta

* Ann-Marie Metten on fundraising strategies and the importance of the
house as a literary landmark but also as a place of significance in the
neighbourhood

* Marion Quednau read the letter from the Writers' Union of Canada and
pointed out the irony of the city permitting demolition of the house in
the same year that Obasan was named the One Book, One Vancouver choice

* Arriving just in time after having been delayed on her return from a
presentation of Naomi's Road in the Vancouver Island community of
Ucluelet and having faced ferry delays, highway traffic accidents,
nothing could  stop her, Joy read from chapter 9 of Obasan about
the house and about history being a part of ourselves that we cannot
deny

Next steps: broadcasting a press release; attending tonight's
all-candidates meeting on heritage issues; phoning, phoning, phoning;
and meeting withGerry McGeough on Monday to plan a workshop with
interested parties to develop fundraising strategies.

A positive step toward saving the house today. Councillor Raymond Louie
even initiated a challenge to other councillors to match his $100. I
believe Todd collected nearly $540 . . .

Ann-Marie Metten
Save Kogawa House Committee
604-263-6586

Save Kogawa House committee goes to City Hall to ask for stay of demolition


Today is the big day…

The Save Kogawa House Demolition is 7th on the agenda list for the Standing Committe of Planning and Environment.

I have worked long and hard on my opening statements, networked
lots,  Ann-Marie has put an information package together, Anton
has recieved the support of dozens of writing organizations from across
Canada.

At 2pm, we go to City Hall and ask for a delay of 120 days for the
demolition of Kogawa House at 1450 West 64th Ave.  We plan to
fundraise for $700,000.

We have been getting some good press from Globe & Mail yesterday.
CBC Radio ran its Arts Report by Paul Grant yesterday morning with good
interviews from Joy Kogawa and myself.

Cross your fingers…

Commentary: David Wong calls Bill C-333 a Sham on Chinese Head Tax


Commentary: David Wong calls Bill C-333 a Sham on Chinese Head Tax


David Wong
is the guest commentator today.  He wrote an e-mail
about Bill C-333, calling it a sham.  David loves the Lo-Wah-Kui,
Chinese Pioneer heritage of Vancouver.  We met in 1986, while
working on the Saltwater City Project celebrating 100 years of Chinese
history in Vancouver.

David Wong writes:

Subject: Re: Bill C-333 scam and sham – write your MP….


As usual, the Chinese Canadian community has been conquered and
divided. We?ve got boneheads speaking up for us… Boneheads and other
assorted perverts who don't really give a shit about our forefathers
(and moms) about who we are today…why it?s so comfy for them …and
most important, why we're so pissed off.

You get the likes of Mr. [name removed] who crows about being fair and
blah blah blah…but what is so friggen fair about this when these
political opportunists claim legitimacy when in actual fact – are not
even part of real headtax descendants? It's like me, talking about how
painful it is to give childbirth when all I experience is a kidney
stone passing through my squirter.

Give me a friggen break. Why is it that other *visible* communities get
shit loads of money without much fuss, when all we, as descendants of
Head Tax payers get token bullfeathers? Is it because our recent
cousins who just offed the boats recently think they can represent my
grand dad because this politicallycorrect-Canadian shares a common
ethnicity? Boneheads like that don't speak for me. Sid Tan and Victor
Wong do.

Mind you, a lot of “new arrivals” do appreciate the jade brick road paved by our Lo-Wah Kiu ancestors…but they don't speak up.

Go on folks. Make Noise. Raise shit. Listen to the words of “Naam Yi
Dong Ji Keung” (the theme to Wong Fei Hong: Once Upon a time in China)
and get inspired.

Because if you don't, more smooth talking Voids will appear from the
bamboo thicket claiming *they* represent you and your children. And
we've got a whole nest of these buggers running for office again. No
bloody wonder when I look up “Chinese Canadian Politician” in the
dictionary, I get a picture of a greasy hair clown…with the caption,
?”oke of the nation”.

David Wong
Vancouver

PS don't give Paul et al your federal vote. Give him the finger instead.

Sing Tao News – Head Tax Coalition criticizes Bill C-133 and NCCC


Here is a translation of  The Front Page Headline News Item in Sing Tao Daily on October 31, 2005

Head Tax Coalition Severely Criticizes the NCCC
Opposition to NCCC heated up, NCCC Representation questioned

Excerpt: The opposition to the National Congress of Chinese Canadians
(hereinafter the NCCC) from the Chinese Canadian community is beginning
to heat up. The Ontario Coalition of Head Tax Payers and Families
(hereinafter the Coalition), which is demanding the federal government
to redress the Head Tax issue including apology and individual
compensation, held a community forum yesterday in Toronto. 
Posters in the meeting hall severely criticize the NCCC on the head tax
issue and question its true representation.  Community leader Dr.
Joseph Wong spoke at the meeting strongly criticized the federal
government’s handling of the head tax issue and stated that their
refusal to apologize is wrong and unacceptable.

<Toronto News> Demanding to have direct dialogue with the federal
government and seeking apology and individual compensation on the Head
tax issue, the Coalition again held a community forum yesterday. 
Over 100 people attended the meeting including many of the head tax
payers and families.  Toronto City Councillor Olivia Chow,
community leader Dr. Joseph Wong, and current affairs critic and former
Taiwan legislator Mr. Ziyuan Hui all came to show support.

The Opposition parties may cast the no vote to Bill C-133

The executive committee members of the Coalition first gave a progress
report on recent development.  Ms. Avvy Go, the executive director
of the Metro Toronto Chinese and Southeast Asian Legal Clinic, reported
that the public hearing of the House of Commons Standing Committee on
Canadian Heritage on Bill C-133, the Chinese Canadian Recognition and
Compensation Bill, has been completed.  The Standing Committee
will be discussing the draft Bill tomorrow.  Members of the two
opposition parties, the NDP and the PQ, which have always supported
apology and individual compensation, will introduce amendments to the
Bill supporting the Coalition.  But Avvy Go reported that the
Liberal members on the Standing Committee may also introduce even more
stringent amendments such as deleting the words “apology” and
“individual compensation” in the draft Bill and maintaining the NCCC as
the sole negotiating unit in the Bill.  These government party’s
amendments may get passed in the Standing Committee because of the
Liberal majority in that committee.  Even if the draft Bill is
sent to the House of Commons for third reading, the Coalition will
continue to lobby politicians to make the necessary changes.  If
unsuccessful, the Coalition will suggest those politicians who support
the Coalition to oppose the Bill.  

The Coalition Co-Chair Mr. George Lau pointed out that since its
formation, the Coalition has received widespread support from the
Chinese Canadian community.  Both the mainstream and the Chinese
media outlets have provided extensive reports on the issue.  He
called for more volunteers to join the Coalition to spread the words
before the upcoming federal election.

Dr. Joseph Wong supports the Coalition

Dr. Joseph Wong spoke at the meeting.  If the federal government
agreed that the Head Tax legislation was racist in nature, but still
refused to apologize and compensate the victims, Dr. Wong said that
then the government’s position is absolutely wrong.  Dr. Wong also
said that he respects the wishes of some head tax payers who do not
agree to individual compensation, but the government should still
apologize to the head tax payers and families and provide compensation
to those who demand it.

Dr. Wong emphasized that if the government continued to ignore the
Coalition and the Chinese Canadian National Council (hereinafter the
CCNC) which has been working on this issue for over 20 years, and
instead negotiates with the NCCC only, it is simply not
acceptable.  He warned the federal government not to treat the
Chinese Canadian community as dummies.  

Mr. Ziyuan Hui urged not vote for Raymond Chan

Others who spoke at the meeting expressed strong dissatisfaction with
the actions of Secretary of State on Multiculturalism Raymond Chan on
this issue.  They also questioned whether the NCCC has the right
to represent the head tax payers and families to negotiate with the
government.  Mr. Ziyuan Hui also spoke at the meeting and urged
people to vote for those who protect the interests of the community in
the next general election and not to vote for Raymond Chan.  

The Co-Chair endorsed the posters

The Coalition and the NCCC oppose each other because of their different
positions on the head tax issue.  The Coalition’s opposition to
the NCCC has heated up yesterday.  On the wall of the meeting
hall, workers have put up many signs and posters criticizing the NCCC
such as “the NCCC hijacked the head tax issue and is unethical in their
claim to represent the head tax payers and families”, “the NCCC is not
qualified to represent head tax payers and families”, “the NCCC’s claim
of support of 280 organizations is bogus and at best exaggerated”, and
“the government has no courage to face the facts and the head tax
payers” etc.

After the meeting, in answer to questions from reporters, the Coalition
co-chair Mr. Lau stated that those posters were put up by workers and
he basically agreed with them.  

 

Sid Tan's reply to Province newspaper article on Bill C-333 on “Chinese Head tax redress”


My friend Sid Tan is
an advocate for Chinese Head Tax Redress.  On Monday he spoke on
CBC Radio's BC Almanac in opposition to Mr. Don Lee of the NCCC, after returning from Ottawa to present to the
Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage.




The following is a letter Sid wrote in reply to the Vancouver Province Article.

Yo Folks. My letter to follow up on the Vancouver Province article. Take care. anon Sid

Re: Group fights Ottawa plan on head tax
by Elaine O'Connor, October 31, 2005, p. A9
Dear Editors.

Thank you for Elaine O'Connor's report on the progress of Bill C-333,
the so-called Chinese Canadian Recognition and Redress Act. Reported
extensively across Canada in the Chinese-language media and somewhat in
the English-language eastern Canada media, the story has been largely
ignored by the English- language media in B.C. Rather disappointing,
considering the size of BC's ethnic Chinese population and the fact the
head tax and exclusion laws were Vancouver-grown politically and
geographically.

The Vancouver connections in this is federal Multiculturalism Minister
Raymond Chan and Don Lee, currently candidate for Vancouver school
trustee. Mr. Lee and his friends formed the National Congress of Chinese Canadians when
the Chinese Canadian National Council took a principled position in the
aftermath of the Tiananmen Square massacre in 1989. The CCNC strongly
condemned the human rights record of the government of the People's
Republic of China. Chinese Canadian PRC apologists felt for their
wallets and the result was the NCCC, sympathetic to a government that
sent tanks to murder citizens in peaceful assembly for democracy and
freedom.

Now the Canadian government maybe negotiating a redress agreement,
primarily a human rights matter, with an organisation formed to thwart
and frustrate the efforts of legitimate human rights and social justice
groups such as the Chinese Canadian National Council. The CCNC was
formed in 1980 and has led the redress campaign nearly since it began
in Vancouver in 1984 when head-tax payer Leon Mark asked Margaret
Mitchell, then New Democrat MP for Vancouver East, if anything could be
done to get his tax refunded.

The NCCC lack of
English-language
literature and website (see www.n-c-c-c.ca)  seemingly underscores
the group's shadowy nature as the long arm of China in our domestic and
local affairs.  Under the guise of culture, art and trade,
the group and it's members have primarily a trade and business agenda.
This ensure  they and the governing federal Liberals will make a
scam and sham of redress for the
sake of votes and financial profit. The surviving head-tax payers,
spouses and descendants, who should be the focus of a just and
honourable redress, will again be humiliated.

As July 1, 1923, then Dominion and now Canada Day, was referred to as
Humiliation Day by the Lo Wah Kiu (old overseas Chinese). Bill C-333 is
already being referred to as the Chinese Canadian Humiliation Act.
Multiculturalism Minister Raymond Chan, one time advocate for freedom
and democracy in China, is in charge of
this file and acting like a houseboy for the government. He should be a
champion for the Lo Wah Kiu, who overcame the 62-years of unjust and
oppressive laws and made it possible for him to be in public office.

This redress is not only a Chinese Canadian community human rights
issue. It is a human rights issue all Canadian should be informed
about. Start by asking how much credibility can Raymond Chan, Don Lee
and the National Congress of Chinese Canadians, with their coziness to
the PRC, have on human rights in Canada? And is the PRC meddling in
Canadian affairs?

Yours sincerely,
Sid Chow Tan, President
Association of Chinese Canadians for Equality and Solidarity Society
(Successor to the Vancouver Association of Chinese Canadians)

Mr. Sid Tan goes to Ottawa to speak on Chinese Head Tax- Bill C-333, Oct 25

Mr. Sid Tan goes to Ottawa to speak on Chinese Head Tax – Bill C-333

Sid Chow Tan: Text of oral presentation on Bill C-333 (inappropriately named
Chinese Canadian Recognition and Redress Act) to the Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage, Ottawa, Ontario, October 25, 2005.





The Association
of Chinese Canadians for Equality and Solidarity Society, acronym
ACCESS, acknowledges the Anishinabe Ottawa First Nation and their
traditional territory where we hold this meeting.




Mister/Madame Chairperson and members of the Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage.



ACCESS is a
not-for-profit human rights and social justice society and community
television corporation.  We are the successor group to the
Vancouver Association of Chinese Canadians, organised to combat racism
and discrimination, to advance the rights of citizens and migrants in
Canada and to redress the Chinese Head Tax and Exclusion
Acts.   




We thank the
Standing Committee for this opportunity to comment on Private Member’s
Bill C-333, the poorly-named named Chinese Canadian Recognition and
Redress Act. 


Poorly-named
because it is not an acceptable redress for many Lo Wah Kiu (old
overseas Chinese) head taxpayers, spouses and descendants.




However, Bill
C-333 maybe be a beginning to just and honourable redress. It should
either be renamed or provide direct individual recognition and
restitution, where possible, to surviving head taxpayers, spouses and
their estates.  




All Canadians
can be inspired by the heroic Lo Wah Kiu struggle for citizenship
rights while oppressed for 62 years by racist legislation.  For
the parliamentary record, I will read a statement by 98-year old head
taxpayer Quan Song Now, also known as Charlie Quan.  To my
knowledge, he is one of four surviving head taxpayers and I have worked
on this redress for twenty years. 




Charlie Quan’s
handwritten statement and voice recording was made shortly after my
confirmed attendance at this hearing.  He asked me to read his
statement to you.  He is a true champion and one of the mightiest
Lo Wah Kiu. 
His statement is addressed to Prime Minister Paul Martin, to whom I have mailed a copy. 



Greetings Prime Minister Paul Martin.



My name is Quan
Song Now. I came to Canada in 1923. At that time, I paid the $500 head
tax. This $500 head tax is unjust. As it was not applied to people from
other parts of the world, it is discriminatory. I hope the government
will refund the head tax in a fair way to all head taxpayers or their
families. This is my sincere quest. I hope you accept my proposal.




Quan Song Now aka Charlie Quan

October 20, 2005, Vancouver, BC



For the
parliamentary record, I want to acknowledge 83-year old Gim Wong for
his recent cross-Canada motorcycle Ride for Redress he began in
Victoria, BC on June 3, 2005.  A pensioner, a Royal Canadian Air
Force World War Two veteran and resident of Burnaby, BC, he and his son
Jeffrey arrived in Ottawa on July 1, 2005, Canada Day.  Gim and
Jeffrey Wong are descendants of mighty Lo Wah Kiu.  Gim Wong’s
father and mother paid the head tax.  He made his ride to call
attention to what any Canadian would want – an apology and refund of an
unjust tax at current fair value.




Fifteen years
ago I told Chow Wong Nooy, my Grandmother on my Father’s side, about my
involvement in the Chinese redress campaign.  Her initial reaction
was to tell me not to oppose the government.  She feared
government authorities would come to our home, tie me up, take me away
and throw me in the river. 


 

I bring this up
because her fear of the Canadian government and its laws had harmed our
family.  The Chinese exclusion law separated her from Chow Gim
(Norman) Tan, her husband and my Grandfather who paid the head tax.
They were separated for over a quarter century.  Wong Mun Sang, my
Grandfather on my Mother’s side, also paid the head tax and experienced
the same separation.  The cry for justice spans many generations
of Lo Wah Kiu.       



We humans are a
species of ideas and language.  We will all be judged by our
families, our neighbours and history.  I say Bill C-333, in it
present form as named, is a perversion of language and travesty of
justice.  Without any attempt at direct individual recognition and
restitution, this so-called redress legislation is just another
humiliation for surviving head taxpayers such as 98-year old Charlie
Quan of Vancouver and 93-year old James Wing of Montreal. 




As a Canadian
who wishes to contribute to a country where freedom of speech and ideas
are Charter rights, I fear this legislation will be referred to as the
Chinese Canadian Humiliation Act.  For the Lo Wah Kiu, July 1,
1923, then Dominion Day and now Canada Day, was referred to as
Humiliation Day because that was the day Chinese exclusion became
law.       




ACCESS is very
concerned Bill C-333 specifies the Canadian government negotiates the
so-called agreement for redress with the National Congress of Chinese
Canadians.  Chinese head tax and exclusion redress is an issue of
human rights and the NCCC formed to be an apologist for the Republic of
China’s appalling human rights record, particularly the Tiananmen
massacre of June 4, 1989. 




We stand before
history.  In 1992, the Honourable Raymond Chan, current Minister
of Multiculturalism and then a human rights activist, often ridiculed
the leadership and actions of the NCCC.  I ask the members of the
Standing Committee to examine the suitability of the National Congress
of Chinese Canadians to negotiate a human rights agreement
with.  


       

A just and
honourable redress will lose much of its meaning if there are no
surviving head taxpayers to accept it.  Redress will lose all of
its meaning if surviving head taxpayers, spouses and second generation
descendants do not receive direct individual recognition and
restitution.  Individuals and families paid the tax and suffered
the hardships of separation.  Where possible, they must be the
focus of any just and honourable redress.


                

I thank those
who encouraged me to be at this hearing, particularly Victor Wong of
the Chinese Canadian National Council and the members of its National
Redress Committee.  I also thank Avvy Go of the Metro Toronto
Chinese and Southeast Asian Legal Clinic for her counsel.  ACCESS
supports the amendments to Bill C-333 as proposed by the Metro Toronto
Chinese and South Asian Legal Clinic. 




ACCESS and the
BC Coalition of Head Taxpayers, Spouses and Descendants support the
Position Statement of the Ontario Coalition of Head Tax Payers and
Families.  They
demand:          




1)  An
apology from the Canadian Government for the injustice perpetrated on
Chinese Canadians under the Head Tax and Chinese Exclusion Act




2)  Direct
redress for the Head Tax payers, widows and their families to be
negotiated between the Canadian Government and those directly affected
by these racist laws; and




3) 
Community redress in the form of education funds and other social
programs to be developed in consultation with the broader Chinese
Canadian community.






Redress now.  It’s only fair.



Thank you.



n.



Vancouver Province: Groups fight Ottawa's Plan on Chinese Head Tax

Vancouver Province
October 31, 2005, p. A9

Vancouvuer Province: Groups fight Ottawa's Plan on Chinese Head Tax

Groups fight Ottawa's plan on head tax
by Elaine O'Connor, Staff Reporter

Chinese-Canadian groups are meeting in Ottawa today to try and put the
brakes on a government bill they say will do nothing to repair the
damage done by the Chinese Head Tax and Exclusion Act (sic).

“There is anger in the community…and it's really coming out in full
force now,” said Victor Wong of the Chinese Canadian National Council.
“The head-tax payers and families are saying, “No, we are not going to
accept this.”

“Ottawa's February budget included a $25-million, three year fund for
programs to addresspast injustices against ethno-cultural groups.”

The council, along with National Anti-Racism Council of Canada and the
B. C. Coalition of Head-Tax-Payers, Spouses and descendants are
protesting the redress plan.

Other groups, including the National Congress of Chinese Canadians,
back the plan, which designates the congress as representative for all
Chinese groups.

“Our group is not calling for individual compensation, but some kind of
funding for community use, for educational purposes, and also maybe for
recognition of the pioneer Chinese and the (war) veterans,” Don Lee,
national director of the congress, said. yesterday. Bill 333 (sic)
comes out for debate in the Commons tomorrow.

Wong, whose grandfather was forced to pay a $500 head tax in 1912, said
the council has been trying to get the government to “come to the table
and negotiate a real redress agreement.”

He discribed the idea of commemorative stamps, plaques, films and photo
exhibits as “token” measures that should be funded by Heritage Canada
so that the $25-million could be used for real redress.

n.

Adrienne Wong (actor/director/producer/writer) hosts CBC Radio's Westcoast Performance Sunday November 6th

Adrienne Wong (actor/director/producer/writer) hosts CBC Radio's Westcoast Performance Sunday November 6th

Here's a message from Adrienne:

I’m hosting an hour of Westcoast Performance this Sunday November 6th
on CBC Radio Two (105.7 FM in Vancouver). The show starts at 12:06 PM —
good news for those who miss the early morning antics of North by
Northwest.

This is a BC programme, those of you who are outside of the province have the option of tuning in over the internet.

The show features some smarty pants indie pop — a band called Mother (www.motherband.com).

adrienne

Writing Associations across Canada support preservation of Kogawa House

Writing associations across Canada support preservation of Kogawa House

OUR VISION FOR KOGAWA HOUSE





The Save Kogawa
House Committee believes it can preserve that heritage by purchasing
the property from its current owner and converting the home into a
writers-in-residence centre. Ten writers associations representing
several thousand writers have endorsed our proposal and would select
members from their organizations to reside in the house for a period of
approximately one month each.




This is their vision of the house as well:

Brian Brett, Chair of the Writers Union of Canada:

“The Writers’ Union of Canada, representing over 1,500 professional
writers,  supports the effort to save Joy Kogawa’s childhood home
on 1450 West 64th Avenue in Vancouver from demolition, and would like
to encourage its conversion into a major writers centre for Canadian
and international writers.

Vancouver would greatly benefit by designating the Joy Kogawa House as
a literary landmark and establishing it as a writers-in-residence
centre in which Canadian writers and writers from abroad could write
first hand about our complex and evolving multi- and inter-cultural
society and how different values and traditions can peacefully
interact.”
 
Brian Busby, President of the Federation of BC Writers:

“The house at 1450 West 64th Avenue which Joy Kogawa and her family
were forced to leave during the relocation of Japanese Canadians is the
central image of her famous novel Obasan, one of Canada’s best-loved
works of fiction. The many groups now coming together to save it
(whether at its present address or at another location) is one of the
strongest yet most diverse such alliances we have ever seen rally round
a cause. The emerging consensus favours employing the house as a new
cultural centre that would highlight the contributions of Vancouver
artists from all backgrounds—not as a shrine but rather as a working
place and as a place for work to be seen. This vision includes having
the facility in operation well before the 2010 Olympic Games.”

Amela Simic, Executive Director of the Playwrights Guild of Canada, representing over 500 members:


“Playwrights Guild of Canada members add their support to the Kogawa
Homestead Committee in their struggle to preserve the house and turn it
into a writers' centre. We think that it would be a grave mistake to
allow the demolition of Joy Kogawa's home, which is an important
landmark for Canadian culture and Canadian history in general. A
vibrant writers' centre would put Vancouver on the map along with other
cultural centres, like Mexico City with its beautiful Casa del Escritor
or Dublin with its Irish Writers' Centre.”


Rosemary Patterson, President of the Vancouver Branch of the Canadian Authors Association:

“The members of the Canadian Authors Association, Vancouver Branch,
would like to add their support to the Joy Kogawa House Committee in
their efforts to prevent the demolition of Joy Kogawa’s former family
home and save it for a writers’ centre as a permanent Olympics benefit
for Vancouver and all of Canada.”

Gordon Graham, President of the Periodical Writers Association of Canada:

“The Periodical Writers Association of Canada was founded in 1976 and
currently represents more than 550 freelance writers across
Canada.  (PWAC) would like to offer its support to the proposal to
develop Joy Kogawa’s home into a writers’ centre.  Writers’
centres and retreats, such as the Pierre Burton House in the Yukon,
have proved to be extremely valuable to writers, which directly
contributes to the further development of Canadian writing. This in
turn reinforces our national cultural resources and hence our ability
to promote ourselves internationally at events such as the Olympics.”

Mary Ellen Csamer, President of the League of Canadian Poets:

“The League of Canadian Poets, representing over 730 professional poets
across Canada, supports the effort to save Joy Kogawa's childhood home
on 1450 West 64th  Avenue in Vancouver from demolition, and would
like to encourage its conversion into a major writers centre for
Canadian and international writers.

Just as Emily Carr’s home in Victoria and Pierre Berton’s in the Yukon
provide a unique sense of the physical space that helped to define
those artists, so this building forms an important part of our
collective cultural imagination. To create a writers’ centre would be
an appropriate and timely action, which would draw national and
international writers to the West Coast for cultural stimulation and
peaceful retreat.”

Constance Rooke, President of PEN Canada:

“PEN Canada supports with immense enthusiasm the idea of turning Kogawa
House into a writers’ centre, and of making this venture a central
piece of legacy of the [Olympic] games. Certainly, we would make
extensive use of this resource. We would use it, for PEN Canada’s
allotted time, to house writers-in-exile, brave men and women who have
fled oppression in their own countries and sought refuge in Canada. We
work very hard to find short-term positions for these writers in
universities and libraries and so on, all across Canada, in order to
help them find their feet in a new country, and accommodation is always
a big part of the challenge we face. You have an opportunity here to do
something of historical importance: a chance to turn threatened
destruction into a very public gesture of preservation, reparation, and
new life.”


Jim Wong-Chu, Executive Director of the Asian Canadian Writers Workshop:

“Joy Kogawa is a pioneer for Asian Canadian literature, and we
recognized her with the 2005 ACWW Community Builders Award. Joy’s works
and legacy brings us closer together as Canadians, learning to overcome
our challenges and diversity. It is important to save Kogawa House as
both a literary and historical landmark. Asian Canadian Writers’
Workshop supports the preservation of Kogawa House, and the creation of
a writing centre.”     


Alma Lee, Founding Artistic Director, and Hal Wake, Incoming Artistic
Director, of the Vancouver International Writers and Readers Festival:

“We understand the historical and cultural significance of this
house as part of Vancouver’s literary heritage and believe that all
efforts should be made to save it from the wrecker’s ball.”


Sylvia McNicoll, President of the Canadian Society of Children’s
Authors, Illustrators and Performers:

On behalf of the members
of CANSCAIP I would like to offer our recommendation and support that
Joy Kogawa’s house be saved from demolition and be converted to a
writer’s retreat.”


Joan Andersen, Chair of the Vancouver Public Library Board:

VPL was honoured to declare Obasan as this year’s One Book One
Vancouver. The community’s positive response to both the book and Joy
has been most gratifying. Joy has spoken of the importance for her of
her first Vancouver home in public meetings and in the media throughout
the summer. The VPL Board understands the symbolic importance of this
modest house in the history of Vancouver, British Columbia and Canada
as well as its significance in Canada’s literary heritage. The
Vancouver Public Library Board supports in principle the campaign to
delay the demolition of the house with the hope of saving it and
converting it to a public use.”


James Wright, General Director, Vancouver Opera:

“Please accept this letter as support in principle from Vancouver Opera
to help exercise a ‘stay of demolition’ of Joy Kogawa’s childhood home
in Vancouver. We were honoured and delighted to receive Joy’s
permission to adapt Naomi’s Road into an opera for young people, which
is currently touring in schools across the province.  In its
premiere four-performance run at the Norman Rothstein Theatre, before
audiences composed mostly of adults, it was a huge hit. We at Vancouver
Opera appreciate the historical and cultural significance of this house
and believe that all efforts should be made to save it from the
wrecker’s ball.”


Tamsin Baker, Lower Mainland Regional Manager of The Land Conservancy:

“TLC would like to express our support towards the efforts to secure
the site and building in perpetuity.  TLC is a provincial land
trust working to protect BC's places of natural and cultural
heritage.  There are many benefits for the community that come
from the conservation and long-term management of important heritage
places. TLC would be willing to possibly provide support to the
community in securing the Kogawa home if the extension to delay the
demolition of the house is granted.”


Henry Kojima, President of the National Association of Japanese Canadians:

“The National Association of Japanese Canadians strongly supports the
retention of the Kogawa House.  The proposed international
writer-in-residence centre in Kogawa House would, indeed, be an
appropriate acknowledgement of our nation’s past, as well as be a
fitting tribute to the importance of Canada’s multi-cultural society
today. We respectfully urge Council to order a temporary protection of
the property for 120 days in order that sources of funding can be
pursued to purchase the home.”


Fred Yada, President of the National Nikkei Museum and Heritage Centre:

“To the Japanese Canadian community and to Canada, Joy's stories have
captured an important aspect of Canadian history, her contribution has
enriched Canadian literature, and she has told a story of many of our
people with dignity and grace. Most importantly, through her, Canadians
have gained awareness and
appreciation for harmony, acceptance, understanding and cultural
exchange. We believe that her work, and that a centre dedicated for
writing, will be a legacy for all Canadians, today and for the future.”

The Save Kogawa
House Committee thanks the current owner of the 1450 West 64th Avenue
property for giving us the opportunity to mobilize this extensive local
and Canada-wide support to raise the funds and purchase the house as a
writers centre.